"Is passive investment management the better alternative? Evidence from the small-cap segment of the US equity fund universe"

Keywords
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Issue Date
2019-08-12
Language
en
Document type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Title
ISSN
Volume
Issue
Startpage
Endpage
DOI
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to ascertain if significant return differences between active- and passive managed investment funds exist. Over a 12 years observation period (2006-2018), alpha coefficients of more than 800 US small cap investment funds were tested. Findings revealed, 0.12% of the mutual funds managed to outperform the S&P SmallCap 600 Index and 76.9% displayed a negative significant risk-adjusted return. Comparing these results with the performance of passive funds confirms a comparative underperformance of mutual funds of 0.31% per month. An additional scenario analysis revealed that the dominance of index- and exchange-traded funds did not exist during the financial crisis 2007 – 2009. The results are showing no significant differences in the movement of returns, which could be explained by a sentiment-driven equity market during financially distressed times. Based on the aggregated results, it leads to the conclusion that passive investment funds are more beneficiary for investors with a long investment horizon but not necessarily superior during financially distressed times.
Description
Citation
Supervisor
Faculty
Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen
Specialisation