Tracking Norms and Values: How Geotracking Applications Cannot be Tools of Care

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorTreiber, Guilel
dc.contributor.authorBoter, Sarah
dc.date.issued2024-08-24
dc.description.abstractGeotracking applications have gained popularity over the past couple of years. Currently, the popular application Life360 has surpassed 50 million monthly active users globally. This thesis argues that applications like Life360 cannot be categorized as tools of care, despite appearances, due to opposed values that are inherent to the application. Accepting the values these applications bring with them is detrimental to child development.
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/17574
dc.language.isoen
dc.thesis.facultyFaculteit der Filosofie, Theologie en Religiewetenschappen
dc.thesis.specialisationspecialisations::Faculteit der Filosofie, Theologie en Religiewetenschappen::Master Filosofie::Philosophy and Science
dc.thesis.studyprogrammestudyprogrammes::Faculteit der Filosofie, Theologie en Religiewetenschappen::Master Filosofie
dc.thesis.typeMaster
dc.titleTracking Norms and Values: How Geotracking Applications Cannot be Tools of Care
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MaScripFIL Boter, S.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Faculteit der Filosofie, Theologie & Religiewetenschappen