Homelessness and teh Role of Self-Responibility: A luck Egalitarian and Democratic Egalitarian Assessment

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorLeeuwen van, Bart
dc.contributor.authorBroeke ten, P
dc.date.issued2019-07-02
dc.description.abstractIn this urban political theoretical study, homelessness is analyzed from a continental normative perspective. Current contributions in political theory do not account for a dominant discourse in society, namely that help should be dependent on the question of self-responsibility. This research therefore analyzed homelessness from a luck egalitarian and democratic equalitarian perspective. It shows that the difference between option luck and brute bad luck cannot morally and empirically be used on homelessness. Democratic equality and the capabilities approach offer a sound alternative to it. In the end, this research pleads for a paradigm switch from a etymological perspective towards a more personal perspective.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/8280
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.thesis.facultyFaculteit der Managementwetenschappenen_US
dc.thesis.specialisationInternational Relationsen_US
dc.thesis.studyprogrammeMaster Political Scienceen_US
dc.thesis.typeMasteren_US
dc.titleHomelessness and teh Role of Self-Responibility: A luck Egalitarian and Democratic Egalitarian Assessmenten_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Masterthesis Homelessness Pim ten Broeke Final Version June 24 2019.docx
Size:
124.96 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Download
Collections
Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen