To report or not to report: Exploring drivers of whistleblowing intention
Keywords
Loading...
Authors
Issue Date
2023-07-12
Language
en
Document type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Title
ISSN
Volume
Issue
Startpage
Endpage
DOI
Abstract
As the challenge of addressing wrongdoing remains prevalent, this study explores when and why
elements of the whistleblowing triangle shape reporting intentions. Specifically, this study questions:
When and why does pressure/incentive, opportunity and rationalization drive whistleblowing intention
at the Radboud University? The objective of this research is to infer the further development of the
whistleblowing triangle. To provide an answer, an abductive qualitative method was adopted with a case
study design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and results were examined via a thematic
analysis. The findings indicated that in times of ambiguity, the combination of moral and social
pressure/incentive triggers greater whistleblowing intention because uncertainty is often associated with
doubts and fears that require extra reassurance. Opportunity becomes salient when sufficient pressures
or incentives prevails to seek greater awareness, available reporting channels and justified reporting
procedures. Importantly, if no distributive justice is anticipated, reporting intentions may be aborted
altogether. While rationalization triggers the intent to report when individual and altruistic benefits
outweigh the costs of reporting. Results further developed the scarce empirical literature on the
whistleblowing triangle and can stimulate policymakers at the Radboud to improve the facilitation of
reporting.
Description
Citation
Supervisor
Faculty
Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen