The differences in the reception of groups of refugees of different nationalities in the Netherlands and the social consequences on non-EU refugees. Ukrainian refugees in comparison to non-European refugees
Keywords
Loading...
Authors
Issue Date
2024-08-07
Language
en
Document type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Title
ISSN
Volume
Issue
Startpage
Endpage
DOI
Abstract
This bachelor thesis explores the extent to which the differentiated reception of Ukrainian refugees compared to refugees from non-European countries impacts these refugees socially in the Netherlands. The study examines various dimensions of this differentiation including specific policies and support mechanism in place, the role of media portrayals and public perceptions and attitudes. Through a comprehensive analysis, the research aims to highlight the significant disparities in treatment and their resultant social consequences for different refugee groups.
The EU’s Temporary Protection Directive, activated in response to the Ukraine crisis, provides Ukrainian refugees with immediate access to residence permits, employment, education and healthcare. This directive facilitates their rapid integration by offering streamlined processes and targeted support. In stark contrast, non-European refugees undergo the standard asylum process, characterized by lengthy and complex procedures, limited access to the labour market and restricted eligibility for social services. These procedural differences underscore the preferential treatment afforded to Ukrainian refugees over their non-European counterparts.
Media portrayals plays a crucial role in shaping public perceptions and attitudes towards refugees and influences policymakers. Ukrainian refugees are frequently depicted in the media as innocent victims of a brutal conflict, deserving empathy and support. Such sympathetic coverage contrast sharply with the portrayal of non-European refugees, who are often associated with security concerns, economic burdens and cultural differences. These divergent narratives significantly influence public attitudes and policy makers, resulting in more favourable treatment for Ukrainian refugees and more scepticism or hostility towards non-European refugees.
Public perceptions of Ukrainian refugees tend to be more favourable, influenced by perceived cultural and geographical proximity. This positive perception translated into greater societal support and smoother integration processes. Conversely, non-European refugees face negative stereotypes and xenophobia, which hinder their integration and create additional barriers to accessing social and economic opportunities.
The differentiated reception of Ukrainian and non-European refugees has profound social implications. Ukrainian refugees benefit rapid integration, social acceptance and access to resources, enhancing their ability to rebuild their lives. Conversely, non-European refugees face systematic barriers that lead to marginalization and long-term disadvantages, which can lead to psychological problems. This bifurcated approach undermines social cohesion and equity, highlighting the need for more consistent and fair refugee policies.
In conclusion, the study finds that the differential reception of Ukrainian and non-European refugees in the Netherlands results in significant social impacts, driven by policy disparities, media portrayals and public attitudes. Addressing these inequities requires comprehensive policy reforms, balanced media narratives and efforts to combat xenophobia and discrimination, fostering a more inclusive and equitable approach to refugee reception and treatment.
Description
Citation
Supervisor
Faculty
Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen