Maximizing Freedom & Limiting Meat Consumption. The compatibility of Government Interference of Libertarianism

dc.contributor.advisor	Tinnevelt, R.
dc.contributor.author	Rosenberg, E
dc.date.issued	2019-06-28
dc.description.abstract	We live in a society where the government takes a lot of measures to increase our safety. We encounter these measures on a very regular basis. If we only look at traffic rules there are many examples, for instance the obligation to wear a seatbelt in a car or a helmet on a motorcycle. Not many people dwell on these obligations or think of them as peculiar, yet at the same time these rules are paternalistic. The most obvious reason why most people accept these rules, even though they restrain our freedom, is because they make our society safer and protect people from harm. Hence, for the sake of our safety, we are willing to accept some infringements of our individual freedom. We accept the obligation of a seatbelt because it makes the chance of harm smaller.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/8278
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.thesis.faculty	Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen	en_US
dc.thesis.specialisation	Political Theory	en_US
dc.thesis.studyprogramme	Master Political Science	en_US
dc.thesis.type	Master	en_US
dc.title	Maximizing Freedom & Limiting Meat Consumption. The compatibility of Government Interference of Libertarianism	en_US

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1