Effects of Viral Outrage on Women’s Participation in Collective Action for Gender Equality
Keywords
Loading...
Authors
Issue Date
2021-07-01
Language
en
Document type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Title
ISSN
Volume
Issue
Startpage
Endpage
DOI
Abstract
Outrage against moral violations motivates people to take collective action. But in the digital
age, expressing moral outrage against perceived injustices has become commonplace. In a
way, this has led to effective social change movements such as the #Metoo and
#BlackLivesMatter campaigns. However, there is also a downside to excessive outrage on
social media – people might find it easy to pile on against a moral offender without engaging
in meaningful actions such as volunteering or donating money for a cause. We hypothesised
that viral outrage hinders collective action, and this relationship is moderated by people’s
support for the status quo, i.e., their system-justification beliefs. Indian women (n = 219)
participated in an online experiment where they either witnessed viral or non-viral outrage
against a sexist post on Twitter and filled intentional and behavioural measures of collective
action for gender equality. Witnessing viral outrage on social media hindered women’s
intentions for collective action but did not relate to policy support or performance on a
donation task.
Keywords: viral outrage, social media, collective action, system-justification theory,
gender equality
Description
Citation
Supervisor
Faculty
Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen