Do we prefer New Urbanist design to conventional suburban design? Towards a new method of measuring the Quality of Place
Keywords
Loading...
Authors
Issue Date
2012
Language
en
Document type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Title
ISSN
Volume
Issue
Startpage
Endpage
DOI
Abstract
In this thesis I test the claim that New Urban design leads to a higher Quality of Life than
conventional (American) suburban design. Considering the continuous growth of suburban living in
the United States, and in light of the many other claims of improvement, the possibility that New
Urban design leads to a higher Quality of Life than conventional suburban design is an interesting
and important one. I furthermore note the need for a subjective, non-ambiguous and nonarbitrarily
defined measure for the relation between place and Quality of Life. A ‘Quality of Place’
measure is developed that uses interviews to determine which elements of neighborhood design
are relevant, and quantitative analyses to judge and compare the importance of, and satisfaction
with these elements, for both a conventional suburban (Orchard) and a New Urban (Kentlands)
neighborhood. New Urban design seems to fulfill its promise of improving the Quality of Life, as
Kentlands has a significantly higher Quality of Place than Orchard. These results further emphasize
the need to review today’s planning practices. However, the results are impaired by a low
response-rate. The measure of Quality of Place nevertheless proves its merit and it is
recommended to use this measure in future research on the relationship between place and
Quality of Life.
Description
Citation
Supervisor
Faculty
Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen