The effect of computer-mediated communication on the expression of opinions
Keywords
Loading...
Authors
Issue Date
2020-07-06
Language
en
Document type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Title
ISSN
Volume
Issue
Startpage
Endpage
DOI
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine if computer-mediated communication (CMC) has a
significant effect on the strength with which people express their opinions. Written CMC data
and spoken face-to-face (F2F) data were generated through an online discourse production
task (DPT) and an interview in which participants provided their opinion on a topic. This data
was quantitatively analysed by scoring appraisal words for sentiment strength using AFINN,
a sentiment lexicon. Hypothesized was that computer-mediated opinionated discourse would
show a stronger sentiment than F2F discourse, largely because of anonymity and lack of
social cues in CMC. A t-test was performed and showed a significant difference in sentiment
strength between the computer-mediated and F2F opinionated discourse. A subsequent
qualitative analysis was carried out to uncover underlying patterns and was done according to
Appraisal theory (Martin & White, 2003). It was expected that computer-mediated discourse
would show higher sentiment strength than F2F discourse when the same topic is addressed.
Secondly, more modality tools are expected to be employed in F2F discourse. Results indeed
showed a stronger sentiment in CMC discourse and a greater use of modality tools in F2F
discourse. Most opinionated discourse research in CMC has been done on microblogs for
marketing purposes and aimed to identify the orientation of microblog posts. This research is
not interested in orientation, but in sentiment strength.
Description
Citation
Supervisor
Faculty
Faculteit der Letteren