(Un)orthodox Scepticism: The Reception of Sextus Empiricus' Pyrrhonism in the Examen vanitatis (1520) of Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorPourq, M.J.G. de
dc.contributor.advisorClaessens, G.
dc.contributor.authoroosthout, Arthur H.
dc.date.issued2017-08-02
dc.description.abstractIn his Examen vanitatis (1520), Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola argues that pagan thought is inferior to and incompatible with the reigning Christian doctrine. Yet despite this, Pico borrows heavily from the arguments of the pagan thinker Sextus Empiricus, who opposed the various dogmata of other ancient philosophers. Previous scholars have analyzed the presence of scepticism in the Examen vanitatis with a tradition-oriented approach. I seek to broaden and nuance this question by analyzing the Examen vanitatis from the perspective of reception studies. Ultimately, the thesis shows that the anti-philosophical Pico and the sceptical Sextus make for uneasy allies. Pico is interested in the part of scepticism that revolves around opposing dogmatic philosophy, since his faith stands in opposition to the same. However, because Pico designates any enquiry not in service of God as sinful, he must also distance himself from the original goals of scepticism.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/5028
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.thesis.facultyFaculteit der Letterenen_US
dc.thesis.specialisationLiterary studiesen_US
dc.thesis.studyprogrammeResearchmastersen_US
dc.thesis.typeResearchmasteren_US
dc.title(Un)orthodox Scepticism: The Reception of Sextus Empiricus' Pyrrhonism in the Examen vanitatis (1520) of Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandolaen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Oosthout A.H. s4245245 ReMA Thesis HLCS .pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Faculteit der Letteren