The permissive stance of the European Commission towards mergers explained

dc.contributor.advisorWigger, Angela
dc.contributor.authorAmerongen van, Milan
dc.date.issued2020-07-17
dc.description.abstractThe European Commission adopts a permissive stance when it comes to mergers and acquisitions in the platform economy. This is in sharp contrast with the approach they take to cartels and abuse of a dominant position. This is puzzling because the effects are largely the same, there is less competition on the market. Two theories are used, social constructivism and neomercantilism. Social constructivism uses ideas and the norm life cycle to explain that the permissive stance is because the norm that mergers are good in the platform economy is internalized by the European Commission. Neomercantilism explains this through the advantages that arise for the European Union or disadvantages for other competitors. There are still further areas for research because there is much unknown about the platform economy.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/10540
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.thesis.facultyFaculteit der Managementwetenschappenen_US
dc.thesis.specialisationInternational Political Economyen_US
dc.thesis.studyprogrammeMaster Political Scienceen_US
dc.thesis.typeMasteren_US
dc.titleThe permissive stance of the European Commission towards mergers explaineden_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Master%20thesis%20Milan%20van%20Amerongen%20s1014840%2017-08-2020.docx
Size:
81.49 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML