Framing the United States federal government shutdown in American newspapers.

Keywords
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Issue Date
2019-06-07
Language
en
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
In this thesis, I study how the most recent federal government shutdown in the United States is framed in The Washington Times and The Huffington Post in terms of positivity and negativity. Precisely, these newspapers were chosen due to their opposing political ideologies, whereby the first one is more conservative and the other one is more liberal. In order to analyze framing, headlines and narratives of news stories were studied in terms of whether they framed the shutdown positively, negatively or neutrally, for which a unique coding scheme was established. Our findings confirmed findings from previous studies, wherein evidence was found that the conservative paper would be more positive than the liberal paper in headlines and narratives. Results also showed that The Washington Times predominantly used neutral framing, and that The Huffington Post predominantly employed negative framing. Also, there was evidence for great consistency between headlines and narratives, implying that headlines were not solely used for their attention-grabbing function.
Description
Citation
Faculty
Faculteit der Letteren