Why persons with disabilities are still left behind: Research in humanitarian action and United Nations Security Council Resolution 2475
Keywords
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Issue Date
2025-06-23
Language
en
Document type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Title
ISSN
Volume
Issue
Startpage
Endpage
DOI
Abstract
Despite the World Health Organization's estimate that 15% of the global population lives with a disability, individuals with disabilities are frequently excluded from academic research. This exclusion extends to conflict studies, even though the number of persons with disabilities in conflict-affected areas is often significantly higher due to violence. This study aims to enhance knowledge and raise awareness about this community by examining the perceived effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council's implementation of Resolution 2475 by organizations of persons with disabilities (OPDs) and other humanitarian organisations that work with person with disabilities.
Resolution 2475, created in 2019, is groundbreaking as it is the first Security Council resolution specifically addressing the situation of people with disabilities living in conflict-affected areas. The resolution seeks to raise awareness about their circumstances and urges all parties in conflict to protect the rights of persons with disabilities, including them in peacebuilding processes and humanitarian projects. However, OPDs have generally responded negatively to the implementation of this resolution, citing several criticisms: 1) lack of representation, 2) lack of inclusion of local and grassroot organisations, 3) lack of capacity building, 4) lack of proper data collection, 5) (dis)ableism, and 6) lack of an intersectional humanitarian lens, as is concluded from the data analysis in this study.
This evidence was gathered through content analysis of reports, website materials, transcripts, and interviews with OPDs. Additionally, the study utilized two theoretical frameworks—neoliberal humanitarianism and subaltern studies—to explain the inadequate implementation of Resolution 2475 and its impact on the humanitarian efforts of OPDs. Strong correlations were identified between these theories and the analysed content. In conclusion, the persistent influence of neoliberal humanitarianism and subaltern studies on the Security Council has resulted in the inadequate creation and implementation of resolution 2475, which has, in turn, failed to positively impact the humanitarian efforts of OPDs.
Description
Citation
Supervisor
Faculty
Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen