Takeovers at gun-point: does hostility pay-off in the long-run?
Keywords
Loading...
Authors
Issue Date
2021-06-28
Language
en
Document type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Title
ISSN
Volume
Issue
Startpage
Endpage
DOI
Abstract
Corporate restructures may take various forms, motives or attitudes. Takeover attitudes are generally characterised as either friendly or hostile. The latter definition has been studied in terms of short-term abnormal returns by a variety of academics. Where the literature on short-term results in the majority of cases are consistent, do long-run performances of hostile takeovers show different outcomes. This study utilises an event study for 63 hostile takeovers, which are defined as mergers and acquisitions, and defines long-run performance as cumulative- and buy-and-hold abnormal returns after a three-year period. The study opts to explain the effect of payment methods, industry- and country-specification, and the effect of hostility in different time periods. The results show negative abnormal returns in general for both dependent variables, but positive returns after a one-year period, therefore contradicting the hypothesized outcomes on short-term and long-run performance. However, mixed payment takeovers and same-industry hostile deals show positive abnormal returns in the long-run, as well do 1997-2007 takeovers compared to 2008-2017 transactions. Therefore, does hostility pay-off? In general no, but in certain situations it does.
Description
Citation
Supervisor
Faculty
Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen