The unexpected embrace of Europa : Conflict resolution and the unintended consequences of the European neighbourhood policy
Keywords
Loading...
Authors
Issue Date
2011-09
Language
en
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The history of the European Union is a story of rebordering. This is no accident.
Geopolitical assimilation is hardwired to the very essence of the EU project—which
is a refined model of international organisation that emerged after previous historical
experiments ended with ever more catastrophic consequences. The Union’s
model relies on a process of imperial governance that seeks compliance in exchange
for incentives. It starts with economic interdependence, goes through
gradual identification and institutional rapprochement and ends with a geographical
embrace. The novelty of this conflict resolution model is that, unlike traditional
ones, it is not primarily based on coercion or threats but on an assertive selfrighteousness
buttressed by a powerful economic leverage. This approach allows
the EU to overcome traditional obstacles for international governance—
particularly national opposition—which have made previous models of international
organisation unstable. Contrary to the mainstream belief—both in politics
and scholarship—in this thesis I argue that the ENP is nothing but enlargement in
disguise and that, if certain conditions remain, it will lead to the eventual absorption
of the EU’s periphery, which could include Turkey, Morocco and Russia. I advance
the idea that the EU has an inertia of its own which is likely to progress
unless a relapse into xenophobia and nationalism takes place
Description
Citation
Supervisor
Faculty
Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen