Comparing two approaches for generating homogeneous multi‐agent teams

dc.contributor.advisorHaselager, W.F.G.
dc.contributor.advisorSprinkhuizen-Kuyper, I.G.
dc.contributor.authorBoezeman, E.
dc.date.issued2008-07-10
dc.description.abstractIn this bachelor thesis we studied the effects of using two different approaches in generating homogeneous multi‐agent teams: the clonal and the a‐clonal approach. The a‐clonal approach was hypothesized to generate better performing teams on tasks that require the development of roles and dynamical role allocation. The task was implemented in a computer simulation. Results show that neither roles nor dynamical role allocation developed. This made a comparison between the clonal and a‐clonal approach impossible, but did show why roles and dynamical role allocation might not have developed.en_US
dc.embargo.lift10000-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/37
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.thesis.facultyFaculteit der Sociale Wetenschappenen_US
dc.thesis.specialisationBachelor Artificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.thesis.studyprogrammeArtificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.thesis.typeBacheloren_US
dc.titleComparing two approaches for generating homogeneous multi‐agent teamsen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Boezeman, E.BaThesis.pdf
Size:
433.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Scriptietekst