Assessing Individuality in Preference Formulation by Lobbying Organisations

dc.contributor.advisorZwaan, P.J.
dc.contributor.authorDijkman, J.A.
dc.date.issued2016-08-29
dc.description.abstractPreference formulation is one of the most basic and fundamental aspects of lobbying; one can hardly conceive of a form of lobbying in which no preferences are voiced with public o cials. Also, lobbying is often regarded and conceptualised as a collective enterprise. Nonetheless, there has been very little research that looks at the size and robustness of the theorised relationship between interaction among organisations on the one hand and their formulation of preferences on the other hand, with Bunea (2013, 2015) as a notable exception. I nd evidence for increased similarity of expressed preferences with institutionally tied organisations in a new case regarding legislation on CO2 emissions by cars, providing further validation for Bunea's ndings. I also add to Bunea's model by taking into account network size, and add value by correcting for some serious methodological issues that accompany the data structure of a dyadic data set.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3661
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.thesis.facultyFaculteit der Managementwetenschappenen_US
dc.thesis.specialisationComparative Public Administration (COMPASS)en_US
dc.thesis.studyprogrammeMaster Bestuurskundeen_US
dc.thesis.typeMasteren_US
dc.titleAssessing Individuality in Preference Formulation by Lobbying Organisationsen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
15_16_038 Master_thesis_Jelko_Dijkman.pdf
Size:
433.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format