Structural Congruity in Co-Speech Gesture

dc.contributor.advisorGeenen, J.G.
dc.contributor.advisorPeeters, D
dc.contributor.authorKoops, A
dc.date.issued2016-07-07
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate the differences in the production of gestures in spontaneous and planned speech. Given the cognitive link between speech and gesture (Kelly et al., 2010; Peeters et al., 2015; McNeill, 2005, 2007) and the differences in the process of spontaneous and planned speech production (Blaauw, 1995; Chawla & Krauss, 1994; Levelt, 1989), the question that was answered was: What are the differences between the gestures that are produced in spontaneous and planned speech? This research was conducted with the use of a semi-structured sociolinguistic interview and a presentation by the same participants, in which their co-speech gestures were analysed. The different types of gestures and the synchronous speech showed various extents of structural congruity; metaphoric gestures and speech were strongly congruent, beat gestures and speech did show some structural congruity but to a lesser extent, and iconic gestures did not show structural congruence. The structural congruity of metaphoric and beat gestures gives further evidence for the cognitive link between speech and gesture.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2426
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.thesis.facultyFaculteit der Letterenen_US
dc.thesis.specialisationEnglish Language and Linguisticsen_US
dc.thesis.studyprogrammeMaster Taalwetenschappen/Linguisticsen_US
dc.thesis.typeMasteren_US
dc.titleStructural Congruity in Co-Speech Gestureen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Koops, A. 4200098.pdf
Size:
7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format